Capitalisation Table and Dilution Analysis
Structured workflow for capitalisation table and dilution analysis: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
Reusable prompt for Malaysian corporate and commercial practice. It should be used with the Universal Corporate Lawyer Control Block and checked by a supervising lawyer before use externally.
Prompt
Reconstruct the fully diluted capitalisation of `[COMPANY]` from the supplied records. Show issued shares by class, registered and beneficial holders, options, warrants, convertibles and proposed issuances. Reconcile the cap table against registers, allotment documents and agreements. Calculate pre- and post-transaction ownership for `[TRANSACTION]`, stating every assumption and formula. Identify pre-emption rights, approvals, class consents, anti-dilution provisions and filing requirements. Do not treat authorised, reserved or promised shares as issued shares.
Repository section: Capital, Investment and Share Transactions
Required inputs: Existing shares; options; convertibles; proposed investment.
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For confidential corporate records, board papers, cap tables, due-diligence materials or transaction documents, use a private/local model where possible.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Practice Area | Corporate / Commercial |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Capital, Investment and Share Transactions |
| Document Type | Capital, Investment and Share Transactions |
| Prompt Number | 13 |
| Required Inputs | Existing shares, options, convertibles, proposed investment. |
| Expected Output | Capitalisation Table and Dilution Analysis output structured for Malaysian corporate practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |
