LAWTECH.MY — Practical legal technology for Malaysian practice
AI Playbook

Corporate Due Diligence Review

Structured workflow for corporate due diligence review: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.

Community feedback only. Editorial ordering is based on relevance, review status and currency.

Reusable prompt for Malaysian corporate and commercial practice. It should be used with the Universal Corporate Lawyer Control Block and checked by a supervising lawyer before use externally.

Prompt

Conduct a legal due diligence review of `[TARGET]` for `[BUYER/INVESTOR]` in connection with `[TRANSACTION]`. Review corporate status, ownership, governance, material contracts, financing and security, assets, IP, employment, disputes, licences, data protection, insurance, tax documents supplied and regulatory compliance. Use a document-indexed issues table. For every finding state the source, issue, risk level, transaction consequence, further information required and recommended treatment through a condition precedent, warranty, indemnity, price adjustment, covenant or remediation. Do not state “no issue” where the relevant documents were not supplied.

Repository section: Due Diligence and M&A

Required inputs: Data room; transaction scope; materiality threshold; target details.

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For confidential corporate records, board papers, cap tables, due-diligence materials or transaction documents, use a private/local model where possible.

JurisdictionMalaysia
Practice AreaCorporate / Commercial
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StageDue Diligence and M&A
Document TypeDue Diligence and M&A
Prompt Number18
Required InputsData room, transaction scope, materiality threshold, target details.
Expected OutputCorporate Due Diligence Review output structured for Malaysian corporate practice.
Reviewed On2026-07-26
Version1.0
Verification ChecklistDistinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation.