Commercial Agreement Drafting
Structured workflow for commercial agreement drafting: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
Reusable prompt for Malaysian corporate and commercial practice. It should be used with the Universal Corporate Lawyer Control Block and checked by a supervising lawyer before use externally.
Prompt
Draft a commercial agreement for `[ARRANGEMENT]` between `[PARTIES]`. First produce a short term-and-risk matrix identifying scope, deliverables, acceptance, pricing, payment, dependencies, service levels, change control, IP, confidentiality, data, warranties, liability, indemnities, insurance, term, termination, transition and dispute resolution. Identify missing commercial instructions. Then draft the agreement using defined terms and operationally workable procedures. Avoid importing provisions irrelevant to the transaction. End with a schedule of blanks, decisions and supporting documents required before execution.
Repository section: Commercial Contracts
Required inputs: Deal summary; parties; commercial terms; precedent if any.
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For confidential corporate records, board papers, cap tables, due-diligence materials or transaction documents, use a private/local model where possible.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Practice Area | Corporate / Commercial |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Commercial Contracts |
| Document Type | Commercial Contracts |
| Prompt Number | 23 |
| Required Inputs | Deal summary, parties, commercial terms, precedent if any. |
| Expected Output | Commercial Agreement Drafting output structured for Malaysian corporate practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |
