LAWTECH.MY — Practical legal technology for Malaysian practice
AI Playbook

Client Interview Questions

Structured workflow for client interview questions: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.

Community feedback only. Editorial ordering is based on relevance, review status and currency.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Review `[CLIENT NARRATIVE]` and `[MATERIALS]`. Prepare a focused set of questions for the next client conference.

Group the questions under:

- identity, authority and standing;
- transaction or relationship background;
- chronology;
- representations, agreements and obligations;
- breach, wrongdoing or defence;
- causation and loss;
- documents and communications;
- witnesses;
- admissions and adverse facts;
- limitation and delay;
- prior proceedings, settlements or regulatory action;
- remedies and commercial objectives.

For each question, briefly state why the answer matters and identify any document that should be requested. Avoid generic questions already answered by the materials. Put the most outcome-determinative questions first.

Repository section: Client Intake and Early Case Assessment

Stage: Pre-action / onboarding

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.

JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StagePre-action / onboarding
Document TypeClient Intake and Early Case Assessment
Prompt Number2
Required Inputs
Expected OutputClient Interview Questions output structured for litigation practice.
Reviewed On2026-07-26
Version1.0
Verification ChecklistDistinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation.