Request and Response for Further and Better Particulars

Structured workflow for request and response for further and better particulars: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Review `[PLEADING]` and draft a focused request for further and better particulars.

Request only particulars necessary to understand the case to be met, define the issues, prevent surprise or prepare for trial. Do not seek evidence, documents, admissions or answers to interrogatories under the guise of particulars.

Use a table identifying the pleading paragraph, words requiring particulars, particulars sought and why they are necessary.

If acting for the responding party instead, draft answers that are sufficient and candid without pleading evidence or expanding the case beyond instructions. Identify requests that are oppressive, evidential, irrelevant or already answered.

---

# E. Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits