Interlocutory Application Strategy
Structured workflow for interlocutory application strategy: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.
Prompt
Advise whether `[PROPOSED APPLICATION]` should be made or resisted. Analyse: - jurisdiction and procedural source of power; - legal test and burden; - evidence required; - notice, timing, service and procedural prerequisites; - whether relief should be ex parte, inter partes or sought by consent; - urgency and delay; - alternative or narrower relief; - undertakings, security or conditions; - likely opposition and reply; - costs consequences; - effect on the trial timetable and overall strategy. Conclude with a recommended application structure: orders sought, grounds, supporting evidence, proposed deponents, key exhibits and drafting sequence.
Repository section: Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Stage: Interlocutory
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia / adaptable |
| Practice Area | Civil Litigation |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Interlocutory |
| Document Type | Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits |
| Prompt Number | 19 |
| Required Inputs | |
| Expected Output | Interlocutory Application Strategy output structured for litigation practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |
