Interim Injunction
Structured workflow for interim injunction: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.
Prompt
Assess and prepare an application for `[PROHIBITORY / MANDATORY / PRESERVATION / OTHER]` interim injunction. Address: - jurisdiction and cause of action; - serious question or applicable merits threshold; - adequacy of damages; - balance of convenience or justice; - preservation of the status quo; - delay, acquiescence and conduct; - undertaking as to damages and ability to honour it; - third-party effects; - urgency, notice and any duty of full and frank disclosure; - duration and precision of the order. Draft narrowly framed prayers, an affidavit plan and submissions outline. Identify every material adverse fact that must be disclosed if relief is sought without notice.
Repository section: Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Stage: Pre-action / interlocutory
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia / adaptable |
| Practice Area | Civil Litigation |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Pre-action / interlocutory |
| Document Type | Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits |
| Prompt Number | 26 |
| Required Inputs | |
| Expected Output | Interim Injunction output structured for litigation practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |
