Security for Costs / Stay / Extension / Setting Aside
Structured workflow for security for costs / stay / extension / setting aside: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.
Prompt
Prepare an application or opposition concerning `[SECURITY FOR COSTS / STAY / EXTENSION OF TIME / SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT / OTHER PROCEDURAL RELIEF]`. Identify the exact legal test, jurisdictional prerequisites, discretionary factors and evidence relevant to the selected application. Address delay, explanation, merits, prejudice, proportionality, conduct, conditions and costs. Distinguish factors that go to jurisdiction from those going only to discretion. Draft the orders sought, affidavit plan and written-submission structure. Include alternative conditional orders that protect the client if the primary position is rejected. --- # F. Case Management and Trial Preparation
Repository section: Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Stage: Interlocutory
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia / adaptable |
| Practice Area | Civil Litigation |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Interlocutory |
| Document Type | Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits |
| Prompt Number | 29 |
| Required Inputs | |
| Expected Output | Security for Costs / Stay / Extension / Setting Aside output structured for litigation practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |
