AI Playbook

Pre-Trial Case Management Plan

Structured workflow for pre-trial case management plan: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.

Community feedback only. Editorial ordering is based on relevance, review status and currency.

#General AI #AI Playbook #Litigation #Case-Management #Pre-Trial #Trial-Readiness

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Prepare a pre-trial case management plan for `[MATTER]`.

Cover: pleadings status; amendments; interlocutory applications; agreed facts; issues to be tried; discovery; documents; notices to admit; expert evidence; factual witnesses; witness statements; subpoenas; interpreters; demonstrative materials; authorities; bundles; written submissions; estimates; settlement steps; compliance dates and trial logistics.

Identify dependencies and critical-path items. Produce a responsibility-and-deadline table and a separate list of matters requiring directions from the court.

Repository section: Case Management and Trial Preparation

Stage: Pre-trial

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.

Jurisdiction	Malaysia / adaptable
Practice Area	Civil Litigation
Party Role	Any / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle Stage	Pre-trial
Document Type	Case Management and Trial Preparation
Prompt Number	30
Required Inputs
Expected Output	Pre-Trial Case Management Plan output structured for litigation practice.
Reviewed On	2026-07-26
Version	1.0
Verification Checklist	Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation.