LAWTECH.MY — Practical legal technology for Malaysian practice
AI Playbook

Cross-Examination Plan

Structured workflow for cross-examination plan: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.

Community feedback only. Editorial ordering is based on relevance, review status and currency.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Prepare a cross-examination plan for `[WITNESS]` on behalf of `[PARTY]`.

Begin with the propositions that must be established, not a list of questions. For each proposition identify:

- why it matters to a pleaded issue;
- the anticipated evidence;
- prior inconsistent statement or objective document;
- sequence of short leading questions;
- exhibit or bundle reference;
- likely answer or evasion;
- follow-up and stopping point;
- whether the proposition must be put to the witness.

Organise the examination into controlled chapters. Distinguish impeachment points from affirmative facts required for the client’s case. Avoid questions whose probable answer is both unknown and harmful unless the strategic purpose is stated.

Repository section: Case Management and Trial Preparation

Stage: Trial preparation / trial

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.

JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StageTrial preparation / trial
Document TypeCase Management and Trial Preparation
Prompt Number34
Required Inputs
Expected OutputCross-Examination Plan output structured for litigation practice.
Reviewed On2026-07-26
Version1.0
Verification ChecklistDistinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation.