AI Playbook
Re-Examination Plan
Structured workflow for re-examination plan: organise the supplied facts and documents, identify missing information, draft or analyse in stages, and verify facts, authorities and assumptions before use.
This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.
Prompt
Based on the witness statement and the actual or anticipated cross-examination, prepare a re-examination plan. Identify matters arising from cross-examination that require clarification without leading the witness or introducing a new case. For each, state the damaging answer or ambiguity, why clarification is permissible, and a neutral open question. Exclude attempts merely to repeat evidence-in-chief or repair an answer through suggestion.
Repository section: Case Management and Trial Preparation
Stage: Trial
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia / adaptable |
| Practice Area | Civil Litigation |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Trial |
| Document Type | Case Management and Trial Preparation |
| Prompt Number | 35 |
| Required Inputs | |
| Expected Output | Re-Examination Plan output structured for litigation practice. |
| Reviewed On | 2026-07-26 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Verification Checklist | Distinguish facts, allegations and assumptions., Cite the document/page for each material fact where possible., Identify missing or contradictory evidence., Do not invent authorities., Check every authority and quote only verified propositions., Separate proposed drafting from facts requiring client confirmation. |